Legal Opinion
State v. Muccio
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 8, 2017No. A15-1951PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILDEA, Chief Justice.
The question presented in this case is whether Minn. Stat. § 609.352, subd. 2a(2) (2016), violates the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. The State charged respondent Krista Muccio under Minn. Stat. § 609.352, subd. 2a(2), with felony communication with a child describing sexual conduct after she sent sexually explicit images and messages to a 15-year-old boy. Muccio moved to dismiss the charge, arguing that the statute facially violates the First Amendment because it proscribes a substantial amount of speech that the First Amendment protects. The…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Matter of Welfare of A. J. B.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
- People v. GarrisonColorado Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. HollowaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
- Linert v. MacDonaldCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- In re A.J.B.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.