Legal Opinion
Brookens v. Solis
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 21, 2009No. Civil Action 08-1612 (ESH)PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, District Judge.
Plaintiff Benoit Brookens has again filed suit against the Secretary of the United States Department of Labor (“DOL”) for race and age discrimination and retaliation under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. 2 In a prior lawsuit before this Court, plaintiff raised claims of discrimination and retaliation regarding three positions to which defendant failed to promote him. On October 21, 2008, this Court granted summary judgment in that case, and this…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Dorns v. GeithnerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Doe v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Herbert v. Architect of the CapitolDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Baird v. SnowbargerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Brookens v. AcostaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.