Legal Opinion
Herbert v. Architect of the Capitol
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 20, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2009-1719PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
Plaintiff Cornell Herbert (“Herbert”), an African American, brings this action against his current employer, the Architect of the Capitol (the “AOC”), claiming that he was discriminated and retaliated against in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”) and the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 (the “CAA”). In his [33] Second Amended Complaint, Herbert asserts a total of five claims against the AOC. In Count I, Herbert claims that he was discriminated against when the AOC did not select him to serve as…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Chase v. Nodine's Smokehouse, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2019
- Newton v. Office of the Architect of the CapitolDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Ey v. Office of the Chief Administrative Officer of the United States House of RepresentativesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Motley-Ivey v. District of Columbia Metropolitan Police DepartmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Herbert v. Architect of the CapitolDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.