Legal Opinion

Buessing v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 28, 1901No. 2183PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Lavaca. Tried below before Hon. M. Kennon. Appeal from a conviction of arson; penalty, five years imprisonment in the penitentiary. ■ In view of the disposition made of the case on this appeal, a general statement' is not required.

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON", Judge.

Appellant was convicted’ of arson, and his punishment assessed at five years’ confinement in the penitentiary; hence this appeal.

In the motion for new trial, appellant complains of the misconduct of the jury on two grounds: First, in receiving other evidence after their retirement; and secondly, in discussing the failure of the defendant to testify. With reference to the first of these grounds, it appears from affidavits- of some of the jurors that some question arose as to whether or not certain tracks, which were used in evidence against appellant, may not have been made…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tate v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
  2. Wilson, Alias Garner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
  3. Thorpe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Fine v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1903
  2. State v. RamboSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  3. Woolley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906
  4. Mizell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  5. Boozer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API