Buessing v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Appeal from the District Court of Lavaca. Tried below before Hon. M. Kennon. Appeal from a conviction of arson; penalty, five years imprisonment in the penitentiary. ■ In view of the disposition made of the case on this appeal, a general statement' is not required.
1Opinion of the Court
HENDERSON", Judge.
Appellant was convicted’ of arson, and his punishment assessed at five years’ confinement in the penitentiary; hence this appeal.
In the motion for new trial, appellant complains of the misconduct of the jury on two grounds: First, in receiving other evidence after their retirement; and secondly, in discussing the failure of the defendant to testify. With reference to the first of these grounds, it appears from affidavits- of some of the jurors that some question arose as to whether or not certain tracks, which were used in evidence against appellant, may not have been made…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Tate v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
- Wilson, Alias Garner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
- Thorpe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
3Cited by10 opinions
- Fine v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1903
- State v. RamboSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- Woolley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906
- Mizell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Boozer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.