Legal Opinion

Thorpe v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 27, 1899No. 1888PublishedCited by 14 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

BROOKS, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of swindling of property under the value of $50, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the county jail for ten days and a fine of $5, and he appeals.

Appellant’s first two grounds of his motion for new trial are: (1) Because the court erred in failing to give his special charge to the effect that the evidence was not sufficient to sustain the charge, and instructing the jury to find defendant not guilty; (2) because the evidence is wholly insufficient to sustain the verdict of the jury.

R. L. McAfee testified for the State, in substance: “About…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tate v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
  2. Wilson, Alias Garner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Turner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  2. Jenkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906
  3. Bailey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906
  4. State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1906
  5. State v. RamboSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API