Fine v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
HENDERSON, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of seduction and his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of four years.
Appellant insists that the corroboration of prosecutrix is not sufficient even if it be conceded that her testimony makes out a case. An examination of the record shows that she testified that she became engaged to appellant, and about six months after the engagement she had intercourse with him. She says that she did so because he promised to marry her, and because he persuaded her, telling her that he was going to marry her, and that other people who…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tate v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
- Wilson, Alias Garner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
- Blain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
- Buessing v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1901
- McCullar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hunter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1955
- Slaughter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Hunter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1954
- Robinson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1982
- Blount v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1964
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.