Woolley v. State

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

This is a case of seduction. We deem it unnecessary to discuss the alleged error of the court refusing the continuance under the view that we have taken of other questions.

The evidence of prosecutrix discloses the fact that in March, 1902, she became engaged to appellant, and that in the following December, it was broken off, as stated by the witness, “on account of boll-weevil.” This was about Christmas. About the 28tli of December, she engaged herself to Gat Lucas, as she stated “the first time he went with me.” This engagement did not last long, perhaps a month.…