Legal Opinion

State v. Rambo

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 7, 1904No. 13,890PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Wyandotte court of common pleas; William G. Holt, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J. :

The appellant, William Rambo, was found guilty of murder in the second degree. On the hearing of the motion for a new trial the affidavit of L. G. Eike, one of the jurors, was filed by defendant in support of his application. The material part reads:

“When the jury retired to consult and deliberate upon their verdict, the fact that William Rambo, commonly known as ‘Toots’ Rambo, defendant, did not go upon the stand to testify in his own behalf was freely commented upon and discussed in the jury-room, and the jurors, while so deliberating,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. BalchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  2. State v. MosleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  3. State v. BaldoserSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
  4. State v. BurtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  5. Tate v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  2. State v. MyersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  3. State v. DyeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  4. State v. EvansSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  5. State of Kansas v. DreilingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API