Legal Opinion
In Re Karr
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided October 15, 1998No. 94-BG-992, 95-BG-562PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUIZ, Associate Judge:
We are presented with the recommendations of the Board on Professional Responsibility in two consolidated cases against respondent, John W. Karr. In the first case, referred to as Karr I, the Board on Professional Responsibility adopted the Hearing Committee’s findings in four joined disciplinary actions, involving four different clients, that Karr violated various disciplinary rules: DR 6-101(A)(3) and Rule 1.3(c) (client neglect and delay in representing Coopers and Stroup); DR 9-103(B)(4) (failure to promptly return client files to Cooper); Rules 1.2(c) and 1.4(a)…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- In Re RebackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Beckman v. FarmerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re TempleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- In Re RebackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Olekanma A. Ekekwe-KauffmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
- In Re SteinbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Landise v. MauroDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- In Re EdwardsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- In Re SchoenemanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.