Martin v. Clem
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
Plaintiff in error, Martin, appeals from a judgment rendered against him •below and in fayor of defendant in error, Clem.
The cause arose in equity; both parties agreed the cause should be tried to the court as an equitable action. Plaintiff below prayed for an accounting under allegations that for the purpose of facilitating a sale of an oil and gas lease he had assigned a two-fifths interest in a certain lease in Seminole county to defendant below, with the understanding that plaintiff was- entitled to share in the proceeds of the sale pro rata. There is no dispute but that the assignment…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ocdike v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Cassidy v. GouldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Edwards v. City Nat. Bank of McAlesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Cassidy v. HornorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Humphrey v. Timken Carriage Co. and BerkeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Oklahoma Company v. O'NEILSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Pet Milk Co. v. BolandCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949