Legal Opinion

Martin v. Clem

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 24, 1929No. 19338PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

Plaintiff in error, Martin, appeals from a judgment rendered against him •below and in fayor of defendant in error, Clem.

The cause arose in equity; both parties agreed the cause should be tried to the court as an equitable action. Plaintiff below prayed for an accounting under allegations that for the purpose of facilitating a sale of an oil and gas lease he had assigned a two-fifths interest in a certain lease in Seminole county to defendant below, with the understanding that plaintiff was- entitled to share in the proceeds of the sale pro rata. There is no dispute but that the assignment…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ocdike v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Cassidy v. GouldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  3. Edwards v. City Nat. Bank of McAlesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Cassidy v. HornorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  5. Humphrey v. Timken Carriage Co. and BerkeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Company v. O'NEILSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  2. Pet Milk Co. v. BolandCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API