Legal Opinion

Cassidy v. Hornor

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 13, 1922No. 10476PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNicholson, J.

This action was brought by 0. G. Hornor, as plaintiff, against M. Oassidy, Alice-Kathryn Oil Company, a corporation, and J. R. Cottingham, as secretary of Alice-Kathryn Oil Company, as defendants, to require the Alice-Kathryn Oil Company to issue and deliver to the plaintiff five shares of capital stock of the Alice-Kathryn Oil Company of the par value of $500. Prom a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, the defendant M. Cassidy prosecuted this proceeding in error. After this proceeding was lodged in this court, M. Cassidy died, and said cause has been revived in the name of, and is now being…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ocdike v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Botsford v. Van RiperNevada Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Catron v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  2. Cassidy v. GouldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  3. Robert A. Wachsler, Inc., a Connecticut Corporation v. Florafax International, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  4. Reid v. KeatorIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Hivick v. UrschelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API