Pet Milk Co. v. Boland
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
COLLET, Circuit Judge.
This action is to recover on quantum meruit for a balance alleged to be due ap-pellee [plaintiff] for the construction of a sewer line for appellant [defendant] at the latter’s Siloam Springs, Arkansas, plant. The controversy in the trial court and about which this appeal is concerned revolves around the question of whether a certain written “Purchase Order” submitted to plaintiff and signed by his representative, his son, represented the agreement between the parties or whether an oral agreement, varying in one important respect from the written purchase order,…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Newton v. Consolidated Gas Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Ware v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Crim v. CrimSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
- Tracy v. Union Iron Works Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1891
- P. A. Smith Co. v. MullerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Home Instead, Inc. v. David FloranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- McKeeman v. Commercial Credit Equipment Corp.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1970
- Pet Milk Co. v. BolandCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
- Bommarito v. Southern Canning Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
- Layne-Minnesota Co. v. City of BeresfordCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.