Ocdike v. Martin
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Ottawa County; A. C. Brewster, Judge. Action by E. A. Martin and others against O. E. Dike and others to recover mining in-térests/' Judgment for plaintiffs, .and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtNicholson, J.
This suit was instituted by E. A. Martin, W. L. Martin, John F. Martin, and Perry Webster, as plaintiffs, against Q.. E. Dike, W. M. .Smith, and O. L. Picher, as defendants, the plaintiffs praying that the court decree them to be the owners of an undivided one-sixth interest each in certain mining rights and a certain contract for a lead and zinc mining lease covering 40 acres of land in Ottawa county. The trial court found for the plaintiffs and entered the decree as prayed for, to reverse which the defendants have prosecuted this appeal. For convenience, we will refer to the parties as they…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- King v. . BarnesNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- McCoy v. McCoySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Lind v. WebberNevada Supreme Court · 1913
- Botsford v. Van RiperNevada Supreme Court · 1910
- Miller v. WalserNevada Supreme Court · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Oklahoma Company v. O'NEILSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Thompson v. DuncanTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- Bakalis v. BresslerIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
- Catron v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Taylor v. BrindleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.