Legal Opinion

Cassidy v. Gould

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 13, 1922No. 10477PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNichodsgn, J.

This action arose out of the same transaction involved in the case of Cassidy v. Horner et al., No. 10476, 86 Okla. 220, 208 Pac. 775, the decision in which is handed down this day. The trial court made lengthy findings of fact, which we will not set out in Ml, but in wjhich it was found as follows:

“The court further finds that it was the understanding of Gould, Hornor, and Cas-sidy that they were to have an equal interest in the venture and they were to unite their labor, skill, and knowledge in the enterprise for their mutual benefit and account. That Gould, Hornor, and Cassidy each…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hunter v. HunterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
  2. Martin v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Miller v. WalserNevada Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Indian Land & Trust Co. v. OwenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Cassidy v. HornorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Taylor v. BrindleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
  2. Harrison v. EavesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  3. Reid v. KeatorIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
  4. American-First National Bank v. PetersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Stallings v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API