Vickers v. Alabama Power Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.
The sole question to he determined in this' case is whether the workman’s injury was one “arising out of and in the course of his empoyment.”
We epitomize and restate those facts which we think are of especial significance as follows:(1) Plaintiff was injured during his period of service, but not while engaged in doing anything he was dil'ectly employed to do.(2) He was not the custodian of any tools or other property of his employer, though he carried on Ms person a pair of pliers and a screwdriver, the necessity for which does not appear.(3) He asked for the use of a locker for" his…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Madden's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- State ex rel. Duluth Brewing & Malting Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Hartz v. Hartford Faience Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Ex Parte Majestic Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Wendt v. Industrial Insurance CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mobile Liners, Inc. v. McConnellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Hamilton Motor Co. v. CoonerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931
- Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Bullard v. Cullman Heading Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.