Bullard v. Cullman Heading Co.

The relation of master and servant was shown and the sole question presented for review is whether or not the plaintiff employee was injured by an accident “arising out of and in the course of his employment.” If the service plaintiff was performing at the time of the injury was outside the scope of his employment, or was not directed or acqiiiesced in by a representative of the defendant authorized to control such, sendee, defendant would not be accountable. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Harris (Ala. Sup.) 117 So. 755; Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Pettis, 206 Ala. 96, 89 So. 201; Vickers…