Legal Opinion

Roach v. Caudle

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1998No. S-6984PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Justice.

I.INTRODUCTION

Hillard Roach appeals the superior court’s decision to dismiss his legal malpractice suit for failure to comply with the applicable statute of limitations. We reverse the superior court’s judgment and remand the case.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Roach hired attorney Larry Caudle to appeal a federal bankruptcy court’s decision. That appeal was dismissed on April 28, 1988, for failure to file a timely notice of appeal. On July 13,1994, Roach sued Caudle in- state court for legal malpractice. In his complaint, Roach alleged that Caudle “never informed plaintiff…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lee Houston & Associates, Ltd. v. RacineAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Kollodge v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Linck v. Barokas & Martin, R.R.Alaska Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Mine Safety Appliances Co. v. StilesAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Cameron v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Egner v. Talbot's, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Erkins v. Alaska Trustee, LLCAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Bradshaw v. State, Department of Administration, Division of Motor VehiclesAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  4. McDowell v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Burke v. HOUSTON NANA, LLCAlaska Supreme Court · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API