McDowell v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARPENETI, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Sam and Joyee McDowell sued the state for trespass alleging that the state permitted petroleum contamination to migrate from its Sterling Highway right-of-way onto the McDowell's property. The superior court granted the state's motion to dismiss the trespass claim because the court had previously dismissed a trespass claim regarding the same event in a pending case between the McDowells and the state. We affirm.
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
Sam and A. Joyee McDowell own residential and investment property in Sterling. Their property is adjacent to the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lambert BRZOSTOWSKI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LAIDLAW WASTE SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Jackinsky v. JackinskyAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- Tolstrup v. MillerAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
- Roach v. CaudleAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
- Osbourne v. BuckmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
3Cited by6 opinions
- Beegan v. State, Department of Transportation & Public FacilitiesAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
- DeNardo v. Calista Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Smith v. CSK Auto, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2006
- Robertson v. American Mechanical, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002
- DeNardo v. Calista Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.