Mine Safety Appliances Co. v. Stiles
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COMPTON, Justice.
David M. Stiles survived a traumatic injury while wearing a safety helmet. He made no attempt to investigate any role the helmet may have played in the accident within the two-year statute of limitations. Stiles discovered an alleged defect in the helmet six years after the accident. This petition arises from the denial of cross motions for summary judgment, the issue being whether the discovery rule doctrine applies to toll the running of the statute of limitations. We hold that the statute of limitations was not tolled.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On April 26,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Zeman v. Lufthansa German AirlinesAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
- Moore v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Hazen v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
- White v. Johns-Manville Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1985
- Gudenau & Co., Inc. v. Sweeney Ins., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Luedtke v. Nabors Alaska Drilling, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1989
- John's Heating Service v. LambAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Richardson v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
- Pedersen v. ZielskiAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Lee Houston & Associates, Ltd. v. RacineAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.