Legal Opinion
Cameron v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided December 20, 1991No. S-3474, S-3510PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
Karl B. Cameron appeals a judgment entered on statute of limitations grounds in favor of the State of Alaska, Alaska Power Authority, Inc., and Ebasco Services, Inc. (hereinafter “the State”) and the award of costs to the State. We affirm. The State cross-appeals the trial court’s determination in limine to prohibit Cameron’s former wife from testifying concerning “any acts, words or conduct which occurred during the marriage.” Because we have affirmed the dismissal of Cameron’s claim, this issue is moot.
FACTS1
From 1965 through 1983, Cameron worked as a miner digging…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Hazen v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
- Helen J. Stoleson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Austin v. Fulton Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
- Gudenau & Co., Inc. v. Sweeney Ins., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Childs v. HausseckerTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- John's Heating Service v. LambAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Ranes & Shine, LLC v. MacDonald Miller Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2015
- Gefre v. Davis Wright Tremaine, LLPAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- Sopko v. Dowell Schlumberger, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.