Legal Opinion

Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. First State Bank of Rollingstone

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 16, 1985No. C9-84-1947PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Appellant bank appeals from a summary judgment in favor of respondent Greyhound. The trial court found that the appellant drawee bank accepted a check payable to Greyhound, based upon the pre-printed name and logo, the signing of the check and parol evidence.

FACTS

Respondent Greyhound Lines, Inc., sued appellant First State Bank of Rollingstone, on a check drawn to Greyhound by B.C. Dahl in the amount of $9,730.44. Appellant drawee bank dishonored the check because Dahl’s account had insufficient funds.

Lou Hodnik, a supervisor for Greyhound, stated in an affidavit that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Megowan v. . PetersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  3. Miles v. City of OakdaleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Wurzburg Bros., Inc. v. ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  5. Weather-Rite, Inc. v. Southdale Pro-Bowl, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rural American Bank of Greenwald v. HerickhoffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  2. Kosbau v. DressCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Dubbe v. A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Mountain America Credit Union v. McClellanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
  5. Buchanan v. Dain Bosworth Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API