Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. First State Bank of Rollingstone
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
Appellant bank appeals from a summary judgment in favor of respondent Greyhound. The trial court found that the appellant drawee bank accepted a check payable to Greyhound, based upon the pre-printed name and logo, the signing of the check and parol evidence.
FACTS
Respondent Greyhound Lines, Inc., sued appellant First State Bank of Rollingstone, on a check drawn to Greyhound by B.C. Dahl in the amount of $9,730.44. Appellant drawee bank dishonored the check because Dahl’s account had insufficient funds.
Lou Hodnik, a supervisor for Greyhound, stated in an affidavit that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Megowan v. . PetersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Miles v. City of OakdaleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Wurzburg Bros., Inc. v. ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Weather-Rite, Inc. v. Southdale Pro-Bowl, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rural American Bank of Greenwald v. HerickhoffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Kosbau v. DressCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Dubbe v. A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Mountain America Credit Union v. McClellanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
- Buchanan v. Dain Bosworth Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.