Legal Opinion
Rural American Bank of Greenwald v. Herickhoff
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 5, 1992No. CX-90-2341PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KEITH, Chief Justice.
This ease involves the interpretation of Minnesota’s credit agreement statute, Minn.Stat. § 513.33 (1990 & Supp.1991),1 and its application to agriculture operational loans made to a retired farmer and his son and daughter-in-law.
Appellant, Rural American Bank of Greenwald (Bank), commenced this action against respondent, Ben Herickhoff, seeking to recover on a promissory note for $175,000, interest and attorney fees. Respondent asserted, as defenses, fraud and breach of the contractual provisions of the Loan Agreement underlying the note. Two weeks before trial, the Bank…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Marriage of Nardini v. NardiniSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Chapman v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Greer v. KooikerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Cretex Companies, Inc. v. Construction Leaders, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Pako Corp. v. CitytrustDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Whitney Nat. Bank v. RockwellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
- Consolidation Services, Inc. v. Keybank National Association and KeycorpCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Lassen v. First Bank Eden PrairieCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Braylock v. JessonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Honeywell, Inc. v. Minnesota Life & Health Insurance Guaranty Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.