Legal Opinion

Miles v. City of Oakdale

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 20, 1982No. 81-153PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YETKA, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order dated October 27, 1980, denying appellants’ motion to amend the trial court’s findings of fact, conclusions of law and order for judgment and from judgment entered on November 6, 1980. Appellants Robert and Kim Miles commenced this action against respondent City of Oakdale, seeking to enjoin the city from allowing water to flow onto the Mileses’ property and for damages. Respondents Steven and Marcy Miller were also joined as defendants on the basis that they breached certain covenants contained in a warranty deed for the property that they sold…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Sheehan v. FlynnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  2. Enderson v. KelehanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  3. Thomsen v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  4. Lamb Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Kraus-Anderson of Minneapolis, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. Desnick v. MastSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. First State Bank of RollingstoneCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Duevel v. JennissenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Evers v. WillabyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  4. Kral v. BoeschCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  5. Buchanan v. Dain Bosworth Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API