Legal Opinion
Buchanan v. Dain Bosworth Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 7, 1991No. C1-90-2437PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KALITOWSKI, Judge.
Edward and Helen Buchanan began simultaneous actions in state and federal court against Dain Bosworth Inc. (Dain) and its registered representative, Vlasie Solon. The federal court dismissed several of the claims and granted Dain and Solon summary judgment on the remaining federal claims prior to trial. Dain and Solon moved for summary judgment in state court on res judicata grounds. The trial court granted the motion and the Buchan-ans appeal.
PACTS
From 1979 to 1982, appellants purchased a number of securities through respondent Dain on the advice of respondent Solon.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,209 Arthur L. Stokes v. Lawrence Lokken and Henson & Tully, a PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Margaret E. KOKE and Anna C. Koke, Appellants, v. STIFEL, NICOLAUS & CO., INC., and Kingsley O. Wright, Sr., AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- Youngstown Mines Corp. v. ProutSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Luis CALDERON ROSADO, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC CIRCUIT BREAKERS, INC., Et Al., Defendants, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Connecticut National Bank v. RytmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- First Interstate Bank of Denver, N.A. v. Central Bank & Trust Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1996
- Brown-Wilbert, Inc. v. Copeland Buhl & Co., P.L.L.P.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006