Legal Opinion
Kosbau v. Dress
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 27, 1987No. C9-86-480PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEDGWICK, Judge.
In this declaratory judgment action, the trial court granted partial summary judgment for respondents, ruling that appellants’ attempted revocation of their notice of cancellation of the parties’ contract for deed was ineffective, and that the contract had been canceled. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
In December 1983, appellants, as sellers, and respondents, as buyers, entered into a contract for deed for the sale of approximately 5000 acres of undeveloped farmland in Aitkin County. In August 1984, respondents requested that appellants release acreage to them so they could…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Gruskin v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- First National Bank v. FlynnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Conley v. DowningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Miller v. SnedekerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Mathwig v. StrandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rudnitski v. SeelySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Summit House Co. v. GershmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Sitek v. StrikerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- Kohler v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- In Re R. Bastyr and Associates, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.