Legal Opinion

Linstrom v. Normile

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 2017No. 20160394PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kapsner, Justice.

[¶ 1] Mike Normile appeals from a judgment entered after a jury found him liable for breach of contract and awarded damages to Brian Linstrom and Leisa Bennett. Because we conclude each issue raised was either waived or was not error, we affirm the judgment.

I

[¶ 2] Brian Linstrom and Leisa Bennett (jointly referred to as the “Linstroms”) hired Mike Normile to complete a remodeling of their home for a price of $107,000.00. The Linstroms paid Normile the contract price plus an additional $30,000.00 for certain changes made during the remodel. Normile believed the Lin-stroms owed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Andrews v. O'HEARNNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Crowston v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Paulson v. PaulsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Piatz v. Austin Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Davis v. KilluNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cass County Joint Water Resource District v. EricksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Haider v. MoenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Garcia v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Command Center v. Renewable ResourcesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Nelson v. NelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API