Legal Opinion

Paulson v. Paulson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 2011No. 20100399PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Mark Paulson appeals from an amended divorce judgment ordering him to pay spousal support to Cheryl Paulson. We affirm, concluding the district court’s findings of fact are not clearly erroneous and the court did not err in awarding spousal support. We deny Cheryl Paul-son’s request that she be awarded attorney fees for defending against a frivolous appeal and her request for sanctions for Mark Paulson’s alleged failure to comply with the appellate rules regarding preparation of the appendix.

I

[¶ 2] Mark and Cheryl Paulson began living together in 1987 and married in…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Fischer v. FischerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Ruff v. RuffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Krueger v. KruegerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Hartleib v. SimesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Heng v. Rotech Medical Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Keita v. KeitaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Martiré v. MartiréNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Rath v. RathNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  4. PHI Financial Services, Inc. v. Johnston Law Office, P.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Valentina Williston, LLC v. Gadeco, LLCNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API