Legal Opinion

Piatz v. Austin Mutual Insurance Co.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 2002No. 20010082PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMANN, Justice.

[¶ 1] Janice Piatz and Rebecca Johnson appeal from the trial court’s judgment dismissing their claims against Austin Mutual Insurance Company for breach of contract and bad faith. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] On July 2, 1997, Janice Piatz and her daughter, Rebecca Johnson, were both injured in an accident when a Barnes County mower tractor made a sudden left turn in front of them pickup on a highway near Sanborn, North Dakota. Both Piatz and Johnson sustained injuries from the collision. Piatz and Johnson had insurance coverage issued by Austin Mutual Insurance Company. The policy…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Aponte-Correa v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
  2. James Johnson and Anne Johnson, Dresser Industries, Intervenor-Appellant v. Helmerich & Payne, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  3. State v. CarlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Anderson v. A.P.I. Co. of MinnesotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Sabot v. Fargo Women's Health Organization, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1993

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Gonzalez v. TounjianNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  2. McDowell v. McDowellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Akerlind v. BuckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. CainNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Kautzman v. KautzmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API