Legal Opinion

Haider v. Moen

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 2018No. 20170348PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jensen, Justice.

[¶ 1] Jeff Moen appeals from a judgment awarding Jason Haider damages for wrongful injury to timber. Moen argues the district court abused its discretion in excluding a jury instruction on treble damages and erred in admitting an expert's testimony. We affirm the district court's admission of expert testimony, reverse the district court's exclusion of a jury instruction *522 on treble damages, and remand this case for a new trial.

I

[¶ 2] Haider owns seven acres of rural property near Foxholm, North Dakota, of which four acres are homestead and three acres are farmland. Trees border…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Seppi v. BettyIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Victory Park Apartments, Inc. v. AxelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Koch Fuels, Inc. v. Cargo of 13,000 Barrels of No. 2 OilCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
  4. Rittenour v. GibsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Wanetick v. Gateway MitsubishiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Fargo v. NikleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Boutrous v. Transform Operating StoresNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  3. Rentz v. BNSF Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Broten v. CarterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Broten v. CarterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API