Crowston v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
Curtis Crowston appealed from a final judgment, entered upon a summary judgment on his post-sale duty to warn claim and a jury verdict on his other claims, dismissing his products liability action against Kelsey-Hayes Company and The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company. We hold that, under negligence principles, when manufacturers learn about dangers associated with the use of their product after it is manufactured and sold, they have a post-sale duty to take reasonable steps to warn foreseeable users about those dangers. We therefore reverse the summary judgment…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. ZenobiaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Cover v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Janich Bros., Inc. v. The American Distilling Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Comstock v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Technical Chemical Company v. JacobsTexas Supreme Court · 1972
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Hurt v. FreelandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Erickson v. BrownNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Diegel v. City of West FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Tansy v. Dacomed Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- State v. ChristensenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.