Legal Opinion
Beverly California Corp., F/k/a Beverly Enterprises, Petitioners/cross-Respondents v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 13, 2000No. 817PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge.
Beverly California Corporation operates nursing homes all over the United States — approximately 900 at the time the labor practices at issue in this appeal occurred. It is avowedly anti-union, and its practices have drawn the attention of the National Labor Relations Board (“the Board”) on no less than five occasions over the last decade or so. Before us in the present appeals are the Board’s orders in Beverly California Corporation, 326 NLRB No. 29 (1998) (Beverly II), and Beverly California Corporation, 326 NLRB No. 30 (1998) (Beverly III), in which the Board…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- National Labor Relations Board v. Gissel Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Multi-Ad Services, Incorporated, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Peter Ohr v. Latino Express, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Beverly Health & Rehabilitation Services, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Fort Dearborn Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- Loparex LLC v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.