Legal Opinion

Dibble v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1968No. 5PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

The issue is: Is there sufficient credible evidence to support the finding that the accident occurred while the decedent was engaged in a deviation from his employment in an act not reasonably necessary for living or incidental thereto within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Act?

The controlling statutory provisions are:

“102.03 Conditions of liability. (1) Liability under this chapter shall exist against an employer only where the following conditions concur:
“(c) 1. Where, at the time of the injury, the employe is performing service growing out of and incidental to his employment. . .…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Van Roy v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Schmidlkofer v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Hansen v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Hipke v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  5. American Motors Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Goranson v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. CBS, Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  3. City of Phillips v. Department of IndustryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Wisconsin Electric Power Co. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Hunter v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API