Dibble v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.
The issue is: Is there sufficient credible evidence to support the finding that the accident occurred while the decedent was engaged in a deviation from his employment in an act not reasonably necessary for living or incidental thereto within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Act?
The controlling statutory provisions are:
“102.03 Conditions of liability. (1) Liability under this chapter shall exist against an employer only where the following conditions concur:
“(c) 1. Where, at the time of the injury, the employe is performing service growing out of and incidental to his employment. . .…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Van Roy v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- Schmidlkofer v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Hansen v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
- Hipke v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- American Motors Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Goranson v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- CBS, Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
- City of Phillips v. Department of IndustryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Wisconsin Electric Power Co. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
- Hunter v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.