Legal Opinion

Hipke v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1952PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGehl, J.

Appellant complains that the commission’s “findings of fact” do not comply with the requirements of sec. 102.18 (1),'Stats., which direct:

“After final hearing the commission shall make and file its findings upon all the facts involved in the controversy, - • • ”

He submits that specific findings should have been made relating to exits, the procedure of blowing the pits, and other matters with respect to which he claimed the defendant had violated either safety orders or statute. He contends that the findings, as set forth above, are merely conclusions of law.

In Tesch v. Industrial Comm.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Marsh Wood Products Co. v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Wisconsin Labor Relations Board v. Fred Rueping Leather Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Tesch v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Heiden v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Eckhardt v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Schuh v. Fox River Tractor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Gant v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Schmidlkofer v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  4. American Motors Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Neese v. State Medical Society of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API