Hansen v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
The facts submitted for consideration are that Hansen was an employee of respondent, that his duties were those of a traveling salesman, and while in Nogales, Arizona, in discharge of his duties, at the close of the day he arranged for his dinner. The statute in which the commission must find the guiding regulations for determining whether the appellant was entitled to an award is sec. 102.03 (1) (f), Stats. 1947. Under this section every employee whose employment requires him to travel is to be deemed while so engaged to be performing service growing out of and incidental to his employment.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State Young Men's Christian Ass'n v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
- Armstrong v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
3Cited by26 opinions
- Goranson v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Andreski v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- CBS, Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
- Neese v. State Medical Society of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Cavalcante v. Lockheed Electronics Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.