Legal Opinion

Giannini v. Campodonico

California Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1917No. S. F. No. 7235PublishedCited by 42 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. Marcel E. Cerf, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLawlor, J.

Plaintiff, through his guardian ad litem, brought this action to recover for personal injuries sustained while in a private stable of the defendant, and alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant. This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment for plaintiff and from an order denying a new trial.

The evidence produced on behalf of the respondent shows that the plaintiff, Gerald Giannini, was fourteen years old and resided across the street from the stable owned by the defendant, who employed a colored stableman to take care of the horses and wagons and keep the stable in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Peters v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Barrett v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Means v. Southern California Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Schmidt v. BauerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Cahill v. E. B. & A. L. Stone & Co.California Supreme Court · 1908

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Oettinger v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Palmquist v. MercerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. MacNeil v. PerkinsArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Demmer v. City of EurekaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Powers v. RaymondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API