Legal Opinion

Marriage of Peterson v. Peterson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 31, 1987No. C2-86-1499PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

This appeal concerns the standing of a divorced father to obtain compulsory blood tests showing whether he is the biological parent of a 17-year old child of his former spouse. The trial court denied the father’s motion, and we affirm.

FACTS

The child’s parents were divorced in 1973, four years after their daughter was born. Twelve years later, the child indicated to appellant, her noncustodial parent, that she knew there was some question whether she was his daughter. For many years appellant had harbored doubts that he was the child’s father.

Following the child’s remark…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State on Behalf of Kremin v. GrahamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. M.M. v. R.R.M.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Marriage of Corwin v. CorwinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Marriage of Fick v. FickCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. S.A. v. M.A.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. A.J.S. v. M.T.H.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  3. In Re Paternity of BJHCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  4. In Re L.Connecticut Superior Court · 1993
  5. S.A. v. M.A.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API