State on Behalf of Kremin v. Graham
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
WAHL, Justice.
These consolidated appeals challenge the constitutionality of Minn.Stat. § 257.62, subd. 1 (1980), which provides for compulsory blood tests in paternity actions upon the request of a party to the action or on the court’s own motion. Appellant putative fathers, who appeal from orders that they submit to blood tests, contend that (1) the statute is primarily designed to further private interests and, therefore, is not proper legislation under the police power, (2) the statute violates substantive due process, and (3) the statute violates their right of privacy and their right not…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Little v. StreaterSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- State v. MeachamWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Cortese v. CorteseNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. Joon Kyu KimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Hall v. LalliArizona Supreme Court · 1999
- In Re the Welfare of J.J.B.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Johnson v. HunterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- State v. BoydSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.