Legal Opinion
M.M. v. R.R.M.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 13, 1984No. C5-84-472PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
M.M. and C.M. appeal from an order denying their post-trial motions to allow the intervention of a guardian ad litem and to order home studies in a custody suit between their parents. Their mother appeals from the same order, which denied her motions to appoint a guardian ad litem for the children, to dismiss their father’s attorney because of a conflict of interest, and to grant a new trial. We reverse and remand for another hearing since we find the children were not adequately represented at trial.
FACTS
The father (R.R.M.) and the mother (K.L.H.) were divorced in 1974.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Saxton v. DennisSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Application of SaxtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Marriage of Tischendorf v. TischendorfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Moose v. VeseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
3Cited by8 opinions
- Madgett v. MadgettCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Marriage of Peterson v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Marriage of Clark v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- G. S. v. T. S.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.