Legal Opinion
In Re L.
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided July 20, 1993PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.
This is a proceeding alleging that the youth, L., is “uncared for” as defined by General Statutes § 46b-120 because she is “homeless.” The putative father (movant) has moved for an order compelling the youth, now sixteen years of age, 1 to submit to a blood test to establish his paternity. The youth objects.
General Statutes § 46b-168 (a) provides in part: “In any proceeding in which a question of paternity is an issue, the court or a family support magistrate, on motion of any party, may order the mother, her child and the putative father ... to submit to one or more blood grouping tests, to…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Dalene C., (Feb. 16, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994
- In re Estate of KapileoSupreme Court of The Commonwealth of The Northern Mariana Islands · 2026