Legal Opinion

In Re Paternity of BJH

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 13, 1998No. C6-97-920PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

573 N.W.2d 99 (1998)

In re the PATERNITY OF B.J.H., Child.

A.J.S., Respondent,

v.

M.T.H., et al., Appellants.

No. C6-97-920.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

January 13, 1998.

Paula Smoot Ogg, Golden Valley, for appellants.

Christopher Brevik, Brooklyn Center, for respondent.

Lorraine S. Clugg, Edina, for guardian ad litem.

Considered and decided by HUSPENI, P.J., and KLAPHAKE and HARTEN, JJ.

OPINION

KLAPHAKE, Judge.

Almost two years after appellants, husband and wife, were married, wife gave birth. Respondent sued to establish his paternity of the child, citing Minn.Stat. § 257.55(f) (1996), which states…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Uselman v. UselmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Marriage of Sefkow v. SefkowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Loth v. LothSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  4. State Ex Rel. Trimble v. HedmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  5. In Re Inspection of Minnesota Auto Specialties, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Vangsness v. VangsnessCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  2. In Re the Welfare of the Children of J.B.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
  3. Marriage of Kremer v. KremerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
  4. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API