Legal Opinion

A.J.S. v. M.T.H.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 13, 1998No. C6-97-920PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLAPHAKE, Judge.

Almost two years after appellants, husband and wife, were married, wife gave birth. Respondent sued to establish his paternity of the child, citing Minn.Stat. § 257.55(f) (1996), which states that a person whose paternity index equals or exceeds 99 percent is presumptively a child’s father. Appellants sought to have the husband adjudicated the child’s father under an analysis of the best interest factors listed in Minn.Stat. § 518.17, subd. 1(a) (1996) and Minn.Stat. § 257.55, subd. 1(a) (1996), which state that a woman’s husband is presumptively the father of her…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Uselman v. UselmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Marriage of Sefkow v. SefkowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Loth v. LothSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  4. State Ex Rel. Trimble v. HedmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  5. In Re Inspection of Minnesota Auto Specialties, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Callender v. SkilesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  2. In Re Paternity of BJHCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  3. Callender v. SkilesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  4. In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: B. Q.-R. H., Mother AKA B. Q. R. H. AKA B. Q.-R. H. AKA B. Q. R. H. and F....Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API