Legal Opinion

City & County of Denver v. Industrial Commission

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 15, 1984No. 83SC166PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROVIRA, Justice.

We granted certiorari to review an unpublished decision of the court of appeals affirming a decision of the Industrial Commission of Colorado (Commission). The court struck the Subsequent Injury Fund (SIF) as a party on the ground that it is not a legal entity which can sue or be sued. It ruled that section 8-53-106(2)(b), 3 C.R.S. (1982 Supp.), established the applicable standard of review, and that that part of the Commission’s order which reversed the referee’s order represented an ultimate conclusion of fact. It also held that in order to impose liability on the SIF, a…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Travelers Indemnity Company v. BarnesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  2. Harding v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  3. Ricci v. DavisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  4. deKoevend v. Board of Education of West End School District RE-2Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  5. Lee v. State Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Climax Molybdenum Co. v. WalterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  2. Trinity Universal Insurance Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  3. United Airlines, Inc. v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  4. Christie v. Coors Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  5. Colorado Department of Revenue v. Woodmen of the WorldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API