Legal Opinion

Wierman v. Tunnell

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 1, 1941No. 14,979PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Otto Bock

Roy J. Tunnell, defendant in error, presented a claim for compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, for personal injuries resulting from an accident arising out of and in the course of his. employment June 10, 1938. Upon the date mentioned he was struck by some sacks of grain which fell from a hand-truck used in his employer’s warehouse. Thereafter he was in a hospital for about 18 days, where “head traction” was immediately applied, followed by the installation of a cast. X-ray plates disclosed “a small spicule of bone fractured off the anterior superior surface of the body of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Colorado Fuel & Iron Corp. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
  2. Lucero v. Climax Molybdenum Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  3. Vail Associates, Inc. v. WestSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  4. Savio House v. DennisColorado Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Eisnach v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF STATE OF COLO.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API