Legal Opinion
London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Industrial Commission
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided July 5, 1921No. 10,038PublishedCited by 18 opinions
Proceeding under the workmen’s compensation act. Judgment for claimant. Error to the District Court of the City and County of Denver, Hon. Julian H. Moore, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Whitford
In this case it is sought to set aside a finding and award of the Industrial Commission. The Commission made this finding: •
“That it has been established as a result of the accident described in the agreement above referred to, and in which it is stated that the claimant ruptured the canal of his bladder; that the claimant has sustained a permanent partial disability equal to ten per cent, of permanent total disability; that said disability arises from the nervous shock sustained by the claimant as a result of the injuries described in the agreement above referred to, and its consequent…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gailey v. Peet Bros. Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- Burbage v. LeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1915
- De Zeng Standard Co. v. PresseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
- Employers' Mutual Insurance v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
3Cited by18 opinions
- Byouk v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940
- Colorado Fuel & Iron Corp. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
- Vail Associates, Inc. v. WestSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Alabama By-Products Co. v. LandgraffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
- Henson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1942
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.