Legal Opinion

Evans v. Zeigler

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 14, 1949No. Civ. 16576PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.

Plaintiff commenced this action to recover a balance allegedly due for services rendered by him in constructing a hydropress for defendants. Judgment was for plaintiff for $3,000 and interest. Defendants appeal from the judgment.

On January 8, 1945, plaintiff and defendants entered into a written agreement whereby the defendants employed plaintiff as a consulting engineer for a period of five years. One of plaintiff’s assignments, under the terms of the agreement, was to supervise the construction of a 500-ton hydropress to be used for metal stamping and die making, which was to be a new or…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Miller v. McLaglenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. Pike v. ZadigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Kraner v. HalseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Pleasant v. SamuelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. McFarland v. HolcombCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Interstate Group Administrators, Inc. v. Cravens, Dargan & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. Moya v. NorthrupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Carranza v. NoroianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Aetna Carpet Co. v. PenznerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Miller v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API