Evans v. Zeigler
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.
Plaintiff commenced this action to recover a balance allegedly due for services rendered by him in constructing a hydropress for defendants. Judgment was for plaintiff for $3,000 and interest. Defendants appeal from the judgment.
On January 8, 1945, plaintiff and defendants entered into a written agreement whereby the defendants employed plaintiff as a consulting engineer for a period of five years. One of plaintiff’s assignments, under the terms of the agreement, was to supervise the construction of a 500-ton hydropress to be used for metal stamping and die making, which was to be a new or…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Miller v. McLaglenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Pike v. ZadigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Kraner v. HalseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Pleasant v. SamuelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- McFarland v. HolcombCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Interstate Group Administrators, Inc. v. Cravens, Dargan & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Moya v. NorthrupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Carranza v. NoroianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Aetna Carpet Co. v. PenznerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Miller v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.