Miller v. Brown
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
HANSON, J. pro tem.
The appeal is taken from a judgment entered on an order sustaining a demurrer to the sixth amended complaint after the plaintiff had refused to avail himself of the right to amend. The sixth amended complaint was set forth in two counts: The first was for damages for breach of an alleged oral contract; the second sought a recovery for work and labor alleged to have been rendered pursuant to an entirely separate oral contract.
The defendant filed a general and special demurrer to each of the counts of the complaint. In ruling that the entire complaint was demurrable the trial…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pike v. ZadigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Pleasant v. SamuelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Evans v. ZeiglerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
3Cited by4 opinions
- Roy Supply, Inc. v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Division of Labor Law Enforcement v. BarnesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Moya v. NorthrupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Staniforth v. The Judges' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016