Legal Opinion

Miller v. Brown

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 7, 1951No. Civ. 18319PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HANSON, J. pro tem.

The appeal is taken from a judgment entered on an order sustaining a demurrer to the sixth amended complaint after the plaintiff had refused to avail himself of the right to amend. The sixth amended complaint was set forth in two counts: The first was for damages for breach of an alleged oral contract; the second sought a recovery for work and labor alleged to have been rendered pursuant to an entirely separate oral contract.

The defendant filed a general and special demurrer to each of the counts of the complaint. In ruling that the entire complaint was demurrable the trial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pike v. ZadigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Pleasant v. SamuelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Evans v. ZeiglerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Roy Supply, Inc. v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. Division of Labor Law Enforcement v. BarnesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Moya v. NorthrupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Staniforth v. The Judges' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API