Legal Opinion

McFarland v. Holcomb

California Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1898No. S. F. No. 1349PublishedCited by 29 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County. John Ellsworth, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

The plaintiff brought this action to establish a claim against the estate of the defendants’ testator, which she had previously presented to them for allowance, and which they had rejected. In her complaint she alleges as the basis of her claim “that William A. Holcomb was at the time of his death indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of seven thousand five hundred dollars as a balance due to plaintiff for nursing, boarding, lodging, counseling, advising, and taking care of the said William A. Holcomh almost continuously from the twenty-ninth day of November, 1870, down to the fourth day of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pleasant v. SamuelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Wise v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Wise v. HoganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Mayborne v. Citizens Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  2. Long Beach City School District v. DodgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Carter v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Cedars Sinai Medical Center v. Mid-West National Life InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2000
  5. Hammond v. Ocean Shore Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1913

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API