Pike v. Zadig
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
The court below sustained the demurrer of certain defendants to plaintiff’s first amended complaint, with leave to the plaintiff to amend said complaint within ten days “on'first paying said defendants twenty-five dollars as terms.” Plaintiff declining to comply with the condition, judgment was entered in favor of the defendants, and plaintiff appeals from such judgment.
Assuming that the complaint was open to the objections specified in the demurrer, there can, of course, be no doubt of the right of the court to impose reasonable terms as a condition of permitting the amended pleading to be…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Castagnino v. BallettaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Minor v. BaldridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Pleasant v. SamuelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Wise v. HoganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Abadie v. CarrilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Rutherford Holdings, LLC v. Plaza Del ReyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Farmers Ins. Exchange v. ZerinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Weitzenkorn v. LesserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Schultz v. HarneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Jogani v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.