Legal Opinion

Carranza v. Noroian

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 25, 1966No. Civ. 562PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN (R.M.), J.

This appeal originated in an action brought by the plaintiff to recover a balance allegedly due him, as a labor contractor, for services and expenses in providing and transporting workers for the harvesting of peaches and nectarines for the defendants. The named defendants were the George Noroian Company, a corporation, and George Noroian, individually. Judgment was for the plaintiff against George Noroian individually in the sum of $2,822.48, with prejudgment interest and costs. The corporation was exonerated. George Noroian, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, appeals…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Primm v. PrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Berniker v. BernikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Carlesimo v. SchwebelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Vogelsang v. WolpertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lippert v. BaileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  2. Title Insurance. Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Sackett v. WyattCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Interstate Group Administrators, Inc. v. Cravens, Dargan & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Title Insurance. Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API