Legal Opinion

Hawkins v. City of La Grande

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 18, 1990No. 86-11-30872, 86-11-30873 CA A47064 (Control), CA A47065PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Defendant city appeals from judgments for plaintiffs 1 on their tort claims, assigning as error the denial of its motion for a directed verdict at the close of all the evidence. 2 ORCP 60. Plaintiffs cross-appeal, arguing that the trial court erred in granting defendant’s motion for a directed verdict on plaintiffs’ inverse condemnation claims. 3 We reverse on the appeal and reverse in part on the cross-appeal.

Because of flooding, defendant discharged effluent from its sewage treatment plant into an adjacent slough from February 25 to March 3, 1986. During that period, plaintiffs’ properties…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lincoln Loan Co. v. State, State Highway Com'nOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Bowden v. DAVISOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Emery v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. MOELLER ET UX v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  5. State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. GlennOregon Supreme Court · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. City of La GrandeOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Shade v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Warner/Elektra/Atlantic Corp. v. County of DuPageDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API